First published: Sat 17 Jan 2026.

Els Slots

Updated Tentative Lists H2 2025

In what I hope will become a half-yearly tradition, I am presenting to you the highlights of the new crop of Tentative Sites that have been submitted in the second half of 2025. The first 6 months were covered here.

Keeping the Tentative Lists on this website up-to-date is important to me: there is no other independent place on the web that does so. Even on the UNESCO website, the topic is covered quite poorly, with no tracing of the lifecycle of the sites, no photos and no maps or validation of geodata (all of which we aim to provide).

The Numbers

2025 has ended with 1807 Tentative Sites (TWHS). In the second half of 2025, 49 were added. 12 of those were replacements of earlier ones. Only 1 TWHS was fully removed and became a Former TWHS (European Paper Mills, Italy).

As with the first half of 2025, the number of new sites listed is significantly above average.

It is hard to keep a perfect track of the numbers, since the UNESCO Bureau often adds sites retrospectively. Last week, even a 2024 listing appeared (the French Beech Forests, probably it had been on hold until their Serbian and Montenegrin counterparts were ready to publish).

In total, 2025 saw 130 new entries and the net result was 51 (as known at the time of writing, January 16, 2026). The trend over the 10 previous years was that an average of 66 new TWHS were added yearly, with a net result of 30; 66 were added, 14 removed, and 22 were inscribed and thus disappeared from the Tentative List as well.

Bobrka oil field
Bobrka oil field Jarek Pokrzywnicki

Full make-overs

The following countries did a major update of their Tentative Lists:

  • Malawi: a refreshed list of 7, including 4 that had been there before.
  • Kazakhstan: 6 new ones, including a reformulation of previously separate petroglyph nominations into larger serial properties.
  • Yemen: a new List of 31, already covered in this separate blog post (submitted in June, it was published by UNESCO retrospectively in July)

India did not do a true makeover, but added another 7 to get to 69 TWHS in total. It now ranks second in the list of Countries with the most TWHS, after Turkiye with 79.

Brazil did a clean-up, removing 5 double ones that were still lingering on the T List while already inscribed, such as Anavilhanas Ecological Station and Atol das Rocas.

Notable individual new entries

The Award for the Best name has to go to: Monumental Monuments and Sanctuaries of the Early Steppe Tradition of Central Eurasia (Mausoleum of Kozy-Korpesh–Bayan Sulu, Ritual Structure Dombauyl, and related “Dyng” Towers) (Kazakhstan). I went with "Monuments and Sanctuaries of the Early Steppe" as the short name to show on the website. At least we can be glad that only the monumental monuments have been included.

And Kazakhstan is so keen to get the Ascension Cathedral in Almaty inscribed, they made it part of two new TWHS within half a year: the Sacred Timber Architecture of Central Asia and The Anti-seismic Heritage of Almaty.

Ascension (Voznesensky) Cathedral, Almaty
Ascension (Voznesensky) Cathedral, Almaty Els Slots

A surprise was the resurfacing of "left-over" Beech Forests. The selected forests in France, Serbia, and Montenegro were deferred at the inscription of the main Beech Forests set in 2021. The ones in France and Serbia even had to be "awakened from the death" as they already had been fully removed and thus demoted to the status of Former TWHS.

Among the more imaginative new entries are:

Looking at the list of sites added in H2 2025, are there any Tentative Sites that stand out for you?

Comments

7 comments

    nan 6 days, 12 hours ago (Jan 18, 2026)
    Looked through them. Poland and Czechia active: Nothing that seems astonishing. Zabrze at least would be better as an extension of Tarnowie Gory into Silesian Mining. Only thing that makes me sad it the Irish list. Looked at Aran Islands and Clonmacnoise and I really dont understand why they got pulled.
    Solivagant 5 days, 16 hours ago (Jan 19, 2026)
    Re the Aran Islands and Clonmacnoise ..... they didn’t really get "pulled" .. they failed even to be put forward for the revised Irish T List! Ireland has adopted a policy by which “Stakeholder Support” must have been demonstrated for a site to be put on the T List. This of course is in line with UNESCO requirements for nominations. So - in 2019 the Irish government invited local authorities to apply for their sites to be added to the new T list and created a level playing field by requiring that existing T List sites also had to reapply…….. Result? No applications from a number of previous candidates. Sites which involved “landscapes” were particularly impacted since local landowners are scared of all the restrictions which they believe (With some justification?) come with UNESCO inscription in the core and buffer zones … and even beyond – this particularly impacted the Burren and the Céide Fields. Some of the hostility also derived from existing tourism volumes – The “Wild Atlantic Way” has already created a tourist “monster” in the far SW without the extra WHS – would they create more (not good) or make no difference (So why bother given the downsides). Another problem relates to multi location entries such as Western Stone Forts and Early Mediaeval Monastic Sites. If all elements were needed to demonstrate OUV then it only needed 1 of the local authorities to drop out and the nomination collapsed!!! This happened for the Forts (where Co. Kerry dropped its contribution) and for the Monasteries (where Co. Offaly didn’t support Clomacnose). And even the sites which did make the T List still face similar issues - the Transatlantic Cable site should really have covered a range of relevant locations across Valentia Island and beyond but it has been pared back simply to 2 buildings to avoid similar issues and still there are objections. Whilst the Royal sites are having problems with Tara and Rathcroghan For the record (and for anyone who might be interested!) I will post links from news sources and Dáil Éireann debates relating to the above issues under the Country Forum for Ireland
    Astraftis 3 days, 4 hours ago (Jan 22, 2026)
    I agree with nan about the Irish T-list. I can understand some local issues (and last year's trouble with the Sceilg Mhichíl expeditions seems to fit in this picture), but they have so many brilliant and unique sites that it remains incomprehensible to me how they could be removed. The Irish T-list screams for revenge.
    Astraftis 3 days, 3 hours ago (Jan 22, 2026)
    Looking at the recent additions, I am most attracted by all the activity in Central Asia, a heritage that is probably not yet highlighted enough. On a more modern note, the Soviet exhibitions also excite me, they do represent a notable historic episode!
    Zos M 15 hours, 16 minutes ago (Jan 24, 2026)
    We are still waiting for China to update theirs. We have seen trickling sone new natural TWHS in 2025. The Cultural and mixed ones are still not released. In Dec 2024, each province/region submitted proposal for new nominations. More transnational sites will be pursued. Domestic sites are also being grouped together and more components of current Tlist. New themes include modern and industrial heritage, cultural routes, early civilization sites. Some former TWHS (FTWHS) are subsumed into new ones. The potential new list might include the following (compiled from different provinces media releases) Already in Current Tlist * Jingdezhen (Jiangxi) * Lingqu Canal (Guangxi) * Sanfang Qixiang (Fujian) * Sanxingdui and Jinsha Sites (Sichuan) * Dong Villages (Guizhou, Hunan) * Qiang And Tang Towers and Villages (Sichuan) * Shaanxi and Shanxi Businessmen Courtyards (Shanxi, Shaanxi) * Turpan Karez Irrigation System (Xinjiang) * Baiheliang (Chongqing) * Hongshan Culture Sites (Liaoning) Expansion of Sites in current Tlist with more components * Ancient Chinese Kiln Sites (Henan and Zhejiang) -- grouping of porcelain kilns some on the current TWHS plus more. Interestingly Jingdezhen Sites is nominated as its own in 2026 * Early Timber Architecture in China (8th - 12th c.) (Hebei, Shanxi, Liaoning, Tianjin) -- expansion of the current Yingxian Pagoda and Yixian Fengguo Temple. Will include already inscribed Foguang Temple (Wutaishan) and FTWHS Dule Temple plus several others * Fenghuang Regional Defensive Wall (Hunan) -- reformulation of current Fenghuang TWHS to include broader scope * Han-Tang Imperial Mausoleums -- Part of current Chinese Silk Roads TWSH. Tombs in around Xian and Xianyang * Water Towns South of the Yangtze (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai) -- now includes 13 components * Ming and Qing City Walls (Zhejiang, Anhui, Hubei, Henan, Fujian, Jiangsu. Hebei, Shaanxi, Liaoning, Hebei, Guangdong, Hunan) -- expanded from the current 4 * Hexi Corridor Historical Heritage (Gansu) - Some in the current Silk Roads TWHS. Includes current TWHS in Zhangye City * Maritime Silk Road Sites * Shudao (Chongqing, Gansu, Shaanxi, Sichuan) * Silk Road Corridors (Qinghai, Xinjiang, Ningxia) * Silk Road Southern Asia Corridor (Sichuan, Tibet Yunnan) * Traditional Baijiu Distilleries (Anhui, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Jiangxi, Guizhou, Jiangsu) -- Expanded from current Tlist
    Zos M 15 hours, 12 minutes ago (Jan 24, 2026)
    New -- Modern and 20th Century Heritage ** Jiageng Educational Heritage (Fujian) ** Modern Industrial Heritage of China (Tianjin, Fujian, Anhui, Hubei, Shandong) -- includes Qingdao-Jinan Railway so the old Railway stations of these cities are included ** Pioneering Work of Modern Chinese Architecture - Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum and Associated Buildings (Jiangsu) -- the one in Nanjing! ** Qingdao Historic District (Shandong) ** Jinan Spring City (Shandong) ** Site of Unit 731 of the Japanese Imperial Army (Heilongjiang) ** Yunnan-Myanmar Road (Yunnan)
    Zos M 15 hours, 10 minutes ago (Jan 24, 2026)
    New -- Cultural Routes ** Tang-Tubo Ancient Road (Shaanxi, Tibet) ** Tea-Horse Road (Sichuan, Tibet) -- posisbly transnational ** Wanli Tea Route (Anhui, Fujian, Henan, Hebei, Hunan, Inner Mongolia, Jiangxi, Shanxi) -- transnational with Mongolia and Russia
Post your comment
Required for comment verification