First published: Tue 30 Dec 2025.

Els Slots

The Quest for 1,100 visited WHS - Year 4

2025 was my fourth year of full-time travel (read here about Day 0, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3). It was a “Year of Calculations”, as I had a big and expensive trip to #1,000 planned late in the year. The rest of the travel year was moulded to achieve exactly the right amount of WHS at the lowest possible cost.

My best-ranked newly visited WHS of this year, all 4* or more, include Djoudj National Park, the Ahwar of Southern Iraq, Damascus, the New Zealand Sub-Antarctic Islands and Macquarie Island. I am also glad that I could finally experience Iraq and Syria in a peaceful setting.

Khan As'ad Pasha Damascus
Khan As'ad Pasha Damascus Els Slots

You can find my updated Trip Planner here, including the actual ‘results’ of 2025. With an added total of 54 (47 new + 7 from the WHC), I am still right on track.

The best ones are behind me

It’s a tough conclusion to make, but after having seen over 80% of all current WHS, I have to accept that I have already seen the best sites. Of course, there are still some to look forward to, but there is no Angkor, Florence or Virunga NP among them. I even got so far that I now only have 7 WHS left with a 4* or higher rating!

My favourite trips between #765 and #1000

During the past 4 years, during which I have been travelling full-time, these are the trips I look back to most fondly. In random order, they are:

  • 5 weeks in Northern Brazil: all self-organized, the high quality of all (T)WHS here, and oh, the people!
  • 2 weeks wild camping in Chad: so pure, like travelling in time. A collection of photos from that trip has been the screensaver on my laptop ever since.
  • 3 weeks Zimbabwe in-depth, by all means of transport: I felt I got to know the country well.
  • And of course, my cherry on the cake: the penguins of remote Macquarie Island!

Fennec fox in the desert of Chad
Fennec fox in the desert of Chad Els Slots

The strategic approach for 2026

After passing the 1,000-mark, I am now embarking on a new stage of my WHS Quest. The cluster strategy has worked well: I think I have proven that focusing solely on WHS (rarely adding TWHS and no other ‘distractions’), choosing the biggest clusters of sites first and fully finishing these clusters (so not a single WHS in a remote corner is left behind), is a great tactic to get high numbers of ‘ticks’ quickly.

Things will be different for the next 100, because:

  1. Keeping the same pace is financially unsustainable: it is not possible anymore to hold on to the 650-EUR-a-WHS rule that I set myself in the previous stage, even 1,000 EUR per WHS seems a stretch. The WHS that are left are often isolated, difficult to access and far away from my home base. Or lie in a country I won't travel to right now (Russia, Iran, Israel). So with the yearly budget staying the same, I won’t be able to squeeze the same amount of WHS out of it.
  2. I got a bit tired of the cluster-approach: for every 10 WHS in a cluster, there usually are 4 poor ones, 4 that are OK and only 2 that are really good. So for the best part of a trip, you’re just ticking without seeing the best sights in the world. The cluster-approach also favours the large countries, and I don’t want to go to the same countries over and over again within a short time period (just to see more Chinese sacred mountains or Australian forests).

Rough Tree Fern at Lamington NP (Gondwana Rainforests)
Rough Tree Fern at Lamington NP (Gondwana Rainforests) Els Slots

So for 2026, I will diversify more and focus on 3 types of sites:

  1. Countries or regions that appeal to me but got left behind because they have only 1 or 2 or even 0 WHS, or where I first visited ages ago.
  2. Good visits to natural sites. Taking Cerrado (Brazil) for example: you can have a perfectly tickable one-day visit to Chapada dos Veadeiros, as so many others did, but the real star here is Emas National Park with its Maned Wolves. This takes more time, money and research.
  3. Back to Europe again. I have done only a few trips around Europe for the last couple of years since I have visited virtually all its WHS already. But as I have written before, the high number of visits to European regions is among the best experiences of the journey overall.

Overall, this year, I expect my trips to be a bit shorter (1-2 weeks), more frequent, and to result in less additional WHS. This way, it will take me 3 years to get to 1,100.

Comments

5 comments

    Kyle Magnuson 5 days, 16 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
    [Yellowstone NP 4.49 - Persepolis 4.37 - Volcanoes of Kamchatka 4.31 - Yosemite National Park 4.29 - Glacier Parks 4.08 - Hawaii Volcanoes 4.05 - Redwood NP 4.02] So these are the 7 WHS you refer to. A couple questions, are you saving Yellowstone for 1,100? If you ever go to California, don't hesitate to reach out to me. No promises, but time permitting my spouse and I would love to introduce you to Yosemite. Lastly, have you considered a trip to Dawson, Canada for the 2026 or 2028 Moosehide Gathering? This could be paired with some of the reserves that make up the Glacier Parks WHS as well. https://www.trondek.ca/moosehide-gathering-2026/
    Els Slots 5 days, 14 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
    I think the US sites will be earlier than 1,100! But I will surely contact you before that. Dawson is also a place of interest to me in the near future, but not this year.
    Kyle Magnuson 5 days, 16 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
    Another topic, how much thought have you put into a DPRK trip along with China's Koguryo Kingdom WHS? Both Goguryeo WHS, Mount Kumgang, Kaesong, and the TWHS (Vertical Vegetation Landscape and Volcanic Landscape in Changbai Mountain - AKA Mount Baekdu) and specifically Pyongyang which is aiming for a 2027 inscription. I suppose it might also be worth waiting until the new Tentative List from the DPRK is published.
    CugelVance 5 days, 15 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
    """"Of course, there are still some to look forward to, but there is no Angkor, Florence or Virunga NP among them. I even got so far that I now only have 7 WHS left with a 4* or higher rating !""""" I would love to reach that point,Els😁 A pity you skip Russia for the time being as it has some impression sites on its tentative list.Fir example Veliky Rostoy for sure deserves a high rating as soon as it becomes an official unesco whs
    nan 5 days, 11 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
    Sounding weird that the greats are gone... And I think it's not entirely correct. For less frequented sites, the rating penalties are quite heavy. Lena Pillars is very likely great site. Average is 4.3, but score is 3.5 as only 8 people rated it. There may still be hidden gems on the list in less travelled or less active countries. And while a new site may have a low rating, a nearby revisit may be stellar. I think the stellar ones deserve a revisit. Is there ever enough of Rome, Florence or Venice? And I found that visiting after the tick and with more patience, less need to cover all the ground and by focusing on new perspectives often yields new insights to a great site (that's what makes it great). One particular example is Flow Country. The Highlands are great. And Orkney is great too and deserves a second visit seeing you score this way below the average. And Shetland sounds fun too. PS: This blog post (I had a sneak peak) actually had me implement a new feature (full missing list with ratings). It's already in test :)
Post your comment
Required for comment verification