First published: Tue 30 Dec 2025.
Els Slots
The Quest for 1,100 visited WHS - Year 4
Comments
5 comments
Kyle Magnuson
5 days, 16 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
[Yellowstone NP 4.49 - Persepolis 4.37 - Volcanoes of Kamchatka 4.31 - Yosemite National Park 4.29 - Glacier Parks 4.08 - Hawaii Volcanoes 4.05 - Redwood NP 4.02] So these are the 7 WHS you refer to. A couple questions, are you saving Yellowstone for 1,100? If you ever go to California, don't hesitate to reach out to me. No promises, but time permitting my spouse and I would love to introduce you to Yosemite. Lastly, have you considered a trip to Dawson, Canada for the 2026 or 2028 Moosehide Gathering? This could be paired with some of the reserves that make up the Glacier Parks WHS as well. https://www.trondek.ca/moosehide-gathering-2026/
Reply
Els Slots
5 days, 14 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
I think the US sites will be earlier than 1,100! But I will surely contact you before that. Dawson is also a place of interest to me in the near future, but not this year.
Kyle Magnuson
5 days, 16 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
Another topic, how much thought have you put into a DPRK trip along with China's Koguryo Kingdom WHS? Both Goguryeo WHS, Mount Kumgang, Kaesong, and the TWHS (Vertical Vegetation Landscape and Volcanic Landscape in Changbai Mountain - AKA Mount Baekdu) and specifically Pyongyang which is aiming for a 2027 inscription. I suppose it might also be worth waiting until the new Tentative List from the DPRK is published.
CugelVance
5 days, 15 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
""""Of course, there are still some to look forward to, but there is no Angkor, Florence or Virunga NP among them. I even got so far that I now only have 7 WHS left with a 4* or higher rating !"""""
I would love to reach that point,Els😁
A pity you skip Russia for the time being as it has some impression sites on its tentative list.Fir example Veliky Rostoy for sure deserves a high rating as soon as it becomes an official unesco whs
nan
5 days, 11 hours ago (Jan 4, 2026)
Sounding weird that the greats are gone... And I think it's not entirely correct. For less frequented sites, the rating penalties are quite heavy. Lena Pillars is very likely great site. Average is 4.3, but score is 3.5 as only 8 people rated it. There may still be hidden gems on the list in less travelled or less active countries. And while a new site may have a low rating, a nearby revisit may be stellar. I think the stellar ones deserve a revisit. Is there ever enough of Rome, Florence or Venice? And I found that visiting after the tick and with more patience, less need to cover all the ground and by focusing on new perspectives often yields new insights to a great site (that's what makes it great). One particular example is Flow Country. The Highlands are great. And Orkney is great too and deserves a second visit seeing you score this way below the average. And Shetland sounds fun too.
PS: This blog post (I had a sneak peak) actually had me implement a new feature (full missing list with ratings). It's already in test :)


