First published: Sat 30 Aug 2025.

Els Slots

Core Zone Findings

Some three months ago, I announced to the other members of the WH Map Data Working Group: “I found my new summer hobby!”. And I was right: I love learning a new skill and there is a meditative quality to nailing down a core zone in a specific way so it can be shown on our maps.

Here are my main findings after having added core zone maps to some 200 WHS. You can follow the current standings and future progress at the dedicated Forum Topic.

Core Zone map that is not going to work
Core Zone map that is not going to work Els Slots

We cannot do all, but we can get far quickly

It seems a gigantic task, but progress has been good. On average, it takes me about 20 minutes to make one. And yes, of course, I am picking the low-hanging fruit first, but most natural WHS (often national parks displayed correctly on any map already) or the more recent cultural ones are easy to do. Cultural landscapes are a drama as they are a WH-specific “fiction”.

We can also import them from other sources: community members who did some mapping in the past, or “professional” resources such as Protected Planet (cooperating with IUCN for the natural WHS but not always correct), or the heritage organizations of the UK, Belgium, and the Netherlands. With the latter resources, they must have an explicit fair-use copyright for non-commercial use, and the file size (due to being very precise) can be an issue; therefore, these are not straightforward to use.

At this year’s WHC, the WH Bureau that administers the official documentation stated that 48% of the WHS do not have an adequate map yet. Taj Mahal has no map, the Ethiopian ones are an enigma, etc.. So in the best case, we could get the core zones covered for 52% = 649 WHS. I don’t know what their definition of “inadequate” is; I certainly have discarded much less than half of what I tried. As long as there are roads shown or plenty of other orientation points, I will manage.

A Core Zone of reasonable quality
A Core Zone of reasonable quality Els Slots

Our core zone maps must be of functional use

Our core zone maps are not so detailed that you can define within a meter whether you have set foot in a core zone or not: this just requires too much work and would also lead to “heavy” maps that would perform poorly on a website.

The starting point is that they must be “functional”:

  • They follow the Official UNESCO documentation: They include all components that comprise this WHS; so if a site has 3 locations, the core zone map shows these 3 locations. They are up-to-date with boundary modifications.
  • They are usable for travel purposes: It is clear which major landmarks are inside and which ones are outside of the core zone.

The core zone mapping has uncovered previous mistakes

As always with taking on a project that handles all WHS, there’s a positive bycatch. While scrutinizing the PDFs of the official maps and the map information on the UNESCO website, you start to notice mistakes. The cause of errors could be made by the nominating State Party, or on our side by copy-paste mistakes, or due to third parties (Google Maps for example isn’t precise regarding locations in China and South Korea).

Some of the findings:

Also interesting to observe is that some WHS core zones are designed in such a way that they avoid a railway line (Tongariro) or a busy ring road (Red Fort Delhi, see image below). Corvey is not that small after all, and Bahla Fort is way more than a fort.

Core Zone Avoiding a Ring Road
Core Zone Avoiding a Ring Road Els Slots

Finally, a big thanks to all who have contributed by sending in their own maps so far. Please keep on doing so: you can create a GeoJSON file, or do it in Google Maps and send us the downloaded KML-file.

Comments

No comments yet.

Post your comment
Required for comment verification