World Heritage Site

for World Heritage Travellers



Forum: Start | Profile | Search |         Website: Start | The List | Community |
General discussions about WHS www.worldheritagesite.org Forum / General discussions about WHS /  
 

Calakmul criteria

 
Author evilweevil
Partaker
#1 | Posted: 11 Jul 2014 09:00 
Does anybody know on which natural criteria Calakmul was inscribed recently when it was made a mixed site? As far as I know, it was originally inscribed in 2002 under cultural criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4, which is still mentioned on the English wikipedia (although the German wikipedia only says 3 and 4, and the Spanish one says 2, 3, 4 and 6). The Unesco site also says 2, 3, 4 and 6, but shouldn't a mixed site have at least one natural criterion?

Not a huge problem, but it just struck me as odd.

Author elsslots
Admin
#2 | Posted: 11 Jul 2014 09:58 
It was proposed under 9 and 10, so will be inscribed under these I guess. I'll update my page

General discussions about WHS www.worldheritagesite.org Forum / General discussions about WHS /
 Calakmul criteria

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message


 ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 
 
www.worldheritagesite.org Forum Powered by Chat Forum Software miniBB ®
 ⇑