We should not highlight individual sites by name, no? There is still 8 days of voting?
Even from the results so far, we have pretty good consensus on the Top 50 missing, it will only improve in the coming days. In all likelihood, there will be some new openings following the 2014 WHC, so we can even do some voting then (in all do time!). Furthermore, our inventory of sites that fail to make Top 50 missing will still be fundamental in our process of adding new sites to our Top 50 missing, no?
Considering our old list, yes there was 61 total sites, but it was very apparent many suggestions had little support and were just added based on relatively small participation. Plenty of original sites will not make it into this new Top 50.
Therefore, I think it is appropriate that our list is cut off at exactly 50 (for now at least). 11 votes for the 50th site demonstrates more consensus than we had for any single site on the original list!