World Heritage Site

for World Heritage Travellers

Forum: Start | Profile | Search | Website: Start | The List | Community |

	www.worldheritagesite.org Forum / Connections /
	Blown up

	elsslots Admin	#1 \| Posted: 30 Apr 2008 14:13
		After 'Damaged in World War II' was introduced, the 'Blown Up' connection seems superfluous or at least has a lot of sites in common with 'Damaged in World War II'. Shall we delete it? I like the WWII-one better, as it's more specific.

	Assif Partaker	#2 \| Posted: 30 Apr 2008 18:16
		I agree with Els.

	Solivagant Partaker	#3 \| Posted: 1 May 2008 04:45
		Just be aware that there are likely to be quite a large number of properties (particularly in Europe) which were "damaged" in WWII - we need to add Westminster for instance. "Blown up" is far more extreme than "Damaged in ...." Also, it seems a shame to "lose" other blown up buildings where this act was/is quite significant on what we see (or don't see!!) today. I would prefer to remove Genbaku dome and add it to the WWII connection and keep/add to the "Blown up" one!

	elsslots Admin	#4 \| Posted: 23 May 2008 12:30
		Blown Up or Destroyed during invasion ?? - My Son, Vietnam by American Bombing Druing Vietnam War in 1969 - Hue, Vietnam by American bombing during the Battle of Hue in 1968

	www.worldheritagesite.org Forum / Connections /
	Blown up