I note that Taos Pueblo has been added to the Connection for "Dependent Territories" using the AB comment "Taos Pueblo is part of a semi-autonomous Native American governed territory. "Administration of Taos Pueblo is vested in the Taos tribe."
This is an interesting aspect and may justify a connection but i don't think it justifies being called a "Dependent territory" because of that -"dependent" and "autonomous" are different statuses - let alone "Semi autonomous"!
I note we have some other "autonomous" areas in this connection too (e.g Jeju). I would suggest that we should either extend the definition of this Connection to include a wider range of "relationships" within a fully sovereign state than pure "dependency" or think harder about additional types of such relationships which might justify separate Connections. But we would need to guard against regarding all internal entities in Federal States or as in UK as being dependent or autonomous or whatever!! There are a lot of different constitutional "arrangements" out there!