The draft decision, including the amendment of Argentina, was just approved.
To quote Solivagant:
what was all the fuss about?
They really only are interested in having more and more sites for their own country, so everybody's happy. The (far more specific) conclusions of the 2020 study will fade into the background.
In this case:
1. The moratorium has been lifted
2. These specific sites will be evaluated on a "case-by-case" basis -> as are all other nominations, so no special status here
3. You only have to fill in some extra paragraphs in the nomination dossier. But who is going to question/challenge those?