Just to say I am looking into the mapping and have started some bits, which I will share in the near future, but just to say don't underestimate how big a task this is.

There are 5,000+ locations inscribed at the moment. There are some shortcuts we can take but on the whole it is fairly long trek, and with some exceptions it isn't something that is too easy to collaborate on without some (free but) specialist software, so is a little different to the work we have conducted previously on mapping locations.

Mapping the core zones is the focus, when looking at the data it is the most logical next step, however it can be done in parallel with any potential POI work. We already have a source for the core zone data for majority of the natural and mixed sites and I have the ones for the UK and imminently the Czech Republic. But if people are aware of local agencies that hold the data for this please feel free to flag them up, I will start a thread.

I'm still trying to decide on the value of buffer zones, I understand that all data is valuable, however it would well double the time required to do it, which is already measurable in multiple years rather than days or weeks.

Further details will follow in the next few weeks but just to let you know there is some activity on it.

I can't find the original post anymore, but Solivagant a few weeks ago requested to change the order of locations to change on the lists on the Site and TWHS pages. It was in alphabetical order, which does not make much sense. I have changed it now to unesco location id first, and if that does not exist, our own location id.

I clicked on the "No reviews yet. !" button when not signed in and it threw this rather unwelcoming error:

@zoe: will check. we have these performance issues in parallel and i really need to spend time on refactoring.

It's ok, I'm just pointing it out.
Also my review looks funny on the main page if I use bullet points but the first 3 were totally fine.
https://i.ibb.co/p0W6BYV/Capture.jpg

The second bullet list was missing a <p> before and </p> after. Maybe something in the editreview template? Will have a look

Request:

We have a gitlab project. Going forward those things should go there. It has grown a bit too difficult to track this in a forum threat.

Generally, with the migration I am working on creating new pages is fairly straightforward.

Hello, just wanted to point out that on this page
https://www.worldheritagesite.org/country/Guatemala
the state party was apparently WHC member in year 0 so I clicked on it for kicks and oops - error.

Fixed! (it was 2017)

Minor corrections/updates - Top Missing 2014

Railways of the Andes (58)
- Peruvian Central Railway (added to tentative list in 2019)

Formerly on Tentative List
- Death Valley National Park (22)

Done!

Hi, Just tried to update my count but the page of visited sites has the majority of sites unticked. Some sites are ticked, but I can't see any pattern in which are which are not. The count seems OK though.

I dare not add my new site as I suspect this will remove a lot of sites.

Can you perhaps investigate - (I'm Paul Schofield)

Thanks

Will look into it now, Paul!

>> Can you try it again? I have put back the previous version, this has you on 448 visited WHS so you may have to add the most recent one again.

Thanks Els - looks OK now!