@Solivagant: I can investigate broken link handling. We also host links in general for sites. This will require some software solution...

Right now, though, working on:
* Embedding Ratings a bit further on the site -> show a reviewers rating with each user review.
* Nudging people to rate and write reviews -> ratings are included in the edit review form. ratings and reviews (least rated/reviewed) will be requested when the checklist is updated.
* Last but not least, doing performance analysis and tuning which will entail some work on the database.

Yes I do have one, but it is not integrated into the "whole system". I run it once in a while, but it is a lot of work to follow-up (check whether a site has just moved instead of been deleted for example).
- We could do a periodic "clean-up", and use some community effort to find links to replace them with. Especially all links to "official" websites should be replaced.
- Others could just be deleted, we (ahum, Nan) could probably automate that some way.


Indeed. Because of that reason I always try to keep meaningful texts in the news links - they still have worth when the news item has expired on another website.

Here's another page loading error due to an unregistered user's links:

https://www.worldheritagesite.org/tentative/id/5722

Any chance to run a query for this to get them all removed at the same time?

fixed. will be contained in larger release that happens soon.

I just put a new version live, which includes the following fixes/enhancements:
* ratings look nicer when shown in lists.
* ratings show along the reviews.
* user is queried for ratings when entering a review.
* review screen itself is a bit revamped.
* user is queried to rate/review sites after updating his count.
* some performance optimizations (hopefully).
* ratings shown and calculated will only show for users who have visited. you can still rate though.

Two issues have come up - the home page shows an error message + the maps have gone blank...
Will try to fix it asap!

The index page is loading again. The map issue is with Els to deploy. The checklist also needs to be updated and the profile page seems off. Should all be back to normal tonight.

There could be something wrong with photo uploading??
If an edit is made to an already published review with an already uploaded photo then the photo seems to get "lost" and has to be uploaded again??
That is what seems to have happened to my Jodrell Bank review - photo was there, made a minor spelling alteration - the photo was still on the edit page but gradually disappeared on the other pages as they updated and then finally on the edit page.

Solivagant

will check.

The same thing happened to me yesterday. I finally rated all my visited sites and now all my photos are gone...

Yes - if you go to the edit page the Photo entry is set at "No photo chosen" rather than with the details of the photo already chosen - the result is that uploads the revised review with NO photo chosen!!
I had also noticed in the earlier (before the latest version) logic that if an edit was made after a photo was chosen but before something else had happened (not quite sure what - some dB update perhaps) and an edit was made then it uploaded the photo again. The photo upload takes longer than the simple edit and displays the "%age uploaded" so it was noticeable. This didn't happen after some point - an edit merely altered the edit and kept the photo.

Hi all!
When accessing to the sites connection for "Built in the 8th century" (https://www.worldheritagesite.org/connection/Built+in+the+8th+century), it opens the 'Built in the 18th century' instead.

Can you take a look to fix it?
Thanks!

That's weird! I also does so with the 6th, 7th centuries etc

the image upload was indeed setting it to blank if no new file is uploaded. fix is with els. the images were also not deleted, so if you let me know who you are on the page, we can bring them back via updating the database @evilweevil.

i will check the connection and the checklist later today.

I've set all your reviews now to Photo = Yes. So all should be there now again

Will now test the more permanent solution as indicated by nfmungard
UPDATE: tested with some of my recent Georgia TWHS reviews & OK now in production

Thanks a lot, Els!