World Heritage Site

for World Heritage Travellers



Forum: Start | Profile | Search |         Website: Start | The List | Community |
About this website www.worldheritagesite.org Forum / About this website /  
 

New version of the website

 
 
Page  Page 3 of 4:  « Previous  1  2  3  4  Next »

Author Durian
Partaker
#31 | Posted: 16 Oct 2014 04:30 
Congratulations Els, for the new version. This new version is better than the previous version especially when open in mobile phone.

Author nfmungard
Partaker
#32 | Posted: 16 Oct 2014 07:45 
Bug report:
http://www.worldheritagesite.org/missingscore2014.html

Click any profile under voters:
http://www.worldheritagesite.org/test/profiles/provile.php?User=1

-> The requested URL /test/profiles/provile.php was not found on this server.

Should be: /profiles/profile.php?User=1

Author nfmungard
Partaker
#33 | Posted: 16 Oct 2014 07:54 
General remark: Like the new layout a lot.

Other observations:

http://www.worldheritagesite.org/worldheritagelist.html

* The top list per region could be linked here.
* The number in brackets means included sites, I presume. Initially I thought visits and was wondering about "Paris (1)". If possible, listing both information, e.g. in a table would be nice.

Sites, e.g.: http://www.worldheritagesite.org/sites/wettropicsofqueensland.html
* Generally I like the formatting for comments, if users are registered on the site.
* However, if a user has no profile it doesn't look like a new entry. E.g.:
"Date posted: May 2012
SWIT Guide (Australia):
Hi,"
* Ideas: Separate entries more clearly and format first row per entry more striking. Alternate backcolor, ...
* Move the date posted information to the header row.

Author elsslots
Admin
#34 | Posted: 16 Oct 2014 09:08 
nfmungard:
Bug report:

Thanks. I've changed it.

Author nfmungard
Partaker
#35 | Posted: 17 Oct 2014 15:27 
Writing my first reviews today... A useful list would be reviews by site. This way we could try to cover missing sites first.

Author JonasK
Partaker
#36 | Posted: 24 Oct 2014 17:35 
Hi Els,
I also really like the new layout - looks much "fresher" in my eyes!
I have one thing, I observed but am not sure if it has to do with the new version: I have the impression that the "TOP 25 Enthusiasts" list isn't updated automatically any more, when changes happen, while the "complete list" is up-to-date immediately after submitting new visits.
I am observing the TOP 25 list particularly, since I am always "fighting" for staying in ;)

Author elsslots
Admin
#37 | Posted: 24 Oct 2014 23:59 | Edited by: elsslots 
JonasK:
"TOP 25 Enthusiasts" list isn't updated automatically any more

Yes you are right. It's always a choice between keeping a page dynamic (so it updates automatically, but is more vulnerable also because it needs a database connection), or make it static (which always works).

I'll see if I can change this specific page back to dynamic.

The new homepage is dynamic by the way.

Author meltwaterfalls
Partaker
#38 | Posted: 9 Dec 2014 04:36 
Hi Els,

I was just wondering if there was anyway of linking from your blog posts to the reviewed sites. I like the blog set up, but there is no direct link from your current review to the page for the sites in question.

Author elsslots
Admin
#39 | Posted: 9 Dec 2014 12:58 
meltwaterfalls:
linking from your blog posts to the reviewed sites

Would a textual link be enough, or do you miss the total overview a page like this provides: http://www.worldheritagesite.org/sites/gebelbarkal.html

Author Solivagant
Partaker
#40 | Posted: 9 Dec 2014 13:27 | Edited by: Solivagant 
elsslots:
Would a textual link be enough,


I too had found it "inconvenient" when reading your review of Gebel Barkal not to be able to link directly to the page for the site!! Since only some of your blogs are going to be reviews isn't it easiest merely to include the link on the first (or early) line of your blog when it is a review or refers to a single WHS?

Another "loss" I have come across v the previous version is the lack of visibility now as to which sites have reviews and which don't - this applies mainly of course to the T List sites since nearly all inscribed sites have been reviewed but even the number of reviews is still of interest. I appreciate that the introduction of the number of locations for inscribed sites (An interesting and useful piece of info) overtook the previous "count" of reviews but couldn't it be re-introduced as a second number on inscribed sites and the only number on T Lists - the "meaning" of the single number is shown at the top of the Inscribed list and could be changed to something along the lines of e.g "followed by counts of
a. The number of locations
b. The number of reviews on this Web site"
(the TList sites would onyl have the latter since only occasionally is the likely number of locations shown on the UNESCO site - e.g for the Bhutanese site I have just been reviewing!)

Author meltwaterfalls
Partaker
#41 | Posted: 9 Dec 2014 16:25 
Yeah I was thinking just a quick link in the text somewhere would be useful.

Author meltwaterfalls
Partaker
#42 | Posted: 10 Dec 2014 05:12 
Oh just noticed you put a link in at the start, yep that was what I was after. The blogs were just missing that onward path, so it is better now.

Author elsslots
Admin
#43 | Posted: 12 Dec 2014 04:20 
Solivagant:
The number of locationsb. The number of reviews on this Web site"

Done!

Author Solivagant
Partaker
#44 | Posted: 12 Dec 2014 07:39 
elsslots:
The number of locationsb. The number of reviews on this Web site"
Done!


Thanks for (very!!) speedy update.

Author meltwaterfalls
Partaker
#45 | Posted: 12 Dec 2014 11:03 
With that update I thought people may be interested to know that there are 50 sites that don't have a review yet.

Here is a list, they mostly breakdown to remote and inaccessible or recent additions:
Unreviewed sites Dec 2014::
Minaret of Jam 
Heard and McDonald Islands 
Macquarie Island 
Noel Kempff Mercado National Park 
Sangha Trinational 
Sangha Trinational 
Mount Wuyi 
Malpelo 
Virunga National Park 
Salonga National Park 
Sangha Trinational 
Cocos Island 
Stone Spheres of the Diquís 
Alejandro de Humboldt National Park 
Santa Ana de los Rios de Cuenca 
Decorated cave of Pont d'Arc 
Rani-ki-Vav 
Great Himalayan National Park 
Bam Cultural Landscape 
Armenian Monastic Ensembles 
Shushtar 
Ardabil 
Gonbad-e Qâbus 
Golestan Palace 
Shahr-i Sokhta 
Ashur 
Saryarka 
Lake Turkana 
Phoenix Islands 
Tadrart Acacus 
Bikini Atoll 
Uvs Nuur Basin 
Petroglyphs of the Mongolian Altai 
Sub-Antarctic Islands 
Air and Ténéré 
Darien National Park 
Western Caucasus 
Central Sikhote-Alin 
Wrangel Island 
Uvs Nuur Basin 
Bassari Country 
Richtersveld 
Central Suriname Nature Reserve 
Ancient villages of Northern Syria 
Sarazm 
Tajik National Park 
Çatalhöyük 
Pergamon 
Tauric Chersonese 
Trang An 

Page  Page 3 of 4:  « Previous  1  2  3  4  Next » 
About this website www.worldheritagesite.org Forum / About this website /
 New version of the website

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message


 ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 
 
 
www.worldheritagesite.org Forum Powered by Chat Forum Software miniBB ®
 ⇑