That would be great. Thanks. Have a safe trip in Azerbaijan and Iran. Iran's not on my radar at the moment, however I look forward to your reviews and pics especially for Azerbaijan as both its WHS seem to be quite easy to visit on a long weekend :)

Also I just noticed the links don't point to the correct pages on the map now, so when I update that I'll try to put in the additional tentative site data that I have to hand

As you may have noticed, we have added maps to the site and profile pages. There are still some known errors with the locations:
- 2016 WHS data are not there yet (we're hoping meltwaterfalls has them?)
- the ones like Versailles etc that are near the equator now, as posted earlier in this topic:


If you find more, please post them here so we have them all together and can change them.
And please: if you're posting coordinates, check if they're right using google maps, don't rely on the ones on the Unesco website as they often are dozens of km's off.

To start with a few of my own:
- some locations in the M'Zab Valley are without coordinates (guess that's why it does not show the map)
- same with Minaret of Jam

Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis has no locations at all (there are 5)
001 São Miguel das Missões -28.5470806,-54.5583562
002 San Ignacio Mini -27.255278;-55.531667
003 Nuestra Señora de Santa Ana -27.3833333;-55.5836206
004 Nuestra Señora de Loreto -27.500000; -55.533333
005 Santa María la Mayor -27.889403, -55.331874

Vladimir seems wrong, too.

I think the easiest solution here is to cross off each country. When the country map is added tonight ;)

Angra do Heroismo and Urbino are both visible on the equator. While Pico Island is in place but named part I Portugal. Still a great well done for the effort and results :)

Versailles and Amiens are off, too. Novgorod seems wrong as well. I will code a UI for entering new locations as a logged on user. Will take me a while and want to finish all the details for the viewing of the site first.

@clyde: Side note... Could you please use line breaks in your reviews? A new paragraph every once in a while comes in handy.

nfmungard Note taken :) Will do as of next review.

These were already noted by Hubert, see above.

Vietnam My Son also a big mistake even in UNESCO website. Its location should be 15.763096, 108.124225

Thailand Ban Chiang should be 17.407113, 103.236653

Indonesia Sangiran should be -7.455689, 110.834405

We've corrected some that were really off:
- Versailles
- Amiens
- Stoclet House
- Urbino
- Durmitor
- Sigirya
- Léon Cathedral
- Novgorod

Fixed those too

And these two as well

This is because the locations are named Part 1, Part2 and Part 3 on the Unesco website.
However, looking at the nomination file, I cannot find any reference to separate locations. On the map provided in that file there seem to be 3 stretches of coast that are included, but without names or coordinates.

For Korea

Should be Removed (tentative sites)
Ipjeom-ri Cluster (not included in inscription)
Wangung-ri Cluster (Inscribed)
Namhansanseong - Ancient Fortified Military and Cultural Landscape of Mt. Namhansan (Inscribed)

Should be Added
SEOUL CITY WALL
GAYA TUMULI OF GIMHAE - HAMAN
THE GORYEONG JISANDONG DAEGAYA TUMULI

TRADITIONAL BUDDHIST MOUNTAIN TEMPLES OF KOREA
Name of Cluster

Seonamsa
Suncheon-si, Jeollanam-do Province
34 59 47.66N
127 19 52.11E
Daeheungsa
Haenam-gun, Jeollanam-do Province
34 28 34.85N
126 37 00.45E
Beopjusa
Boeun-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do Province
36 32 30.97N
127 49 59.10E
Magoksa
Gongju-si, Chungcheongnam-do Province
36 33 32.27N
127 00 44.28E
Tongdosa
Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do Province
35 29 16.66N
129 03 54.28E
Bongjeongsa
Yeongju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province
35 39 11.64N
128 39 43.87E
Buseoksa
Andong-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province
36 59 55.80N
128 41 14.76E