World Heritage Site

for World Heritage Travellers

| Forums | Reply | Search |             Start | The List | Community | Blog
WHC Sessions Forum / WHC Sessions /

News from Seville (WHC meeting 2009)

Page  Page 5 of 5:  « Previous  1  2  3  4  5  
Author Khuft
#61 | Posted: 28 Jul 2009 18:50 
I still don't really get the part about the Triple Arch of Dan... ICOMOS recommended inscription, but the WHC now wants Israel to provide some additional information - what exactly is missing this time? Anyone knows?

Author m_m
#62 | Posted: 26 Sep 2009 20:51 | Edited by: m_m 
so the supposed area of 1,000+ ha. for wadden sea turned out to be a typographical error. it is almost 1M ha. in size. the error was due to assumption that the commas to indicate the thousands place for the area of some subsites were treated as decimals. as for the dolomites, there is also a difference in the area as published in the whc website (130,000+ ha) vs the advisory body evaluation (140,000+ ha.). very typical of whc. it's the official website of the whs and yet the infos they include there are inaccurate. lol.

Page  Page 5 of 5:  « Previous  1  2  3  4  5 
WHC Sessions Forum / WHC Sessions / News from Seville (WHC meeting 2009) Top

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message


Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first. Forum Powered by Chat Forum Software miniBB ®