After Zoë Sheng's review of Historical and Archaeological Site of La Isabela (Dominican Republic) and then doing my own reading of the UNESCO description, I must say it looks by far the least interesting of the nominations for 2020. Its particularly disappointing because the Dominican Republic just recently updated their tentative list and there are some worthwhile nominations in pursuit of world heritage status.

Any thoughts by our community about some of the worthy nominations for 2020? Sure, as we identified Padova Urbs picta in our Top Missing List, this is certainly a highlight and a welcome nomination since Italy's recent nominations have been mediocre at best.

Yeah it's crummy, but the rock art in Saudi Arabia is a close second.

Bad sign for Prado-Retiro's chance?

https://www.elmundo.es/madrid/2019/10/12/5da06453fc6c83f2588b45ae.html

Is this being combined with the silk road tentative site(s)?

Swayambhu, Thousand Pillar temples have no 'universal value'?

https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/telangana/2019/oct/25/swayambhu-thousand-pillar-temples-have-no-universal-value-2052613.html

Only quanzhou in 2020. You can get some chinese infomation from wechat or baidu.

The website here has those all bunched together for 2020, that's why I'm asking.

It also made me think if a connection "inscribed in host country" makes sense. There are surely more than 3 already though.

We have it already: https://www.worldheritagesite.org/connection/WHC+locations
I see we miss this year's Sheki - will add it

Fixed it!

Thailand's KKFC again in WHC 2020

After Thailand has been selected a new member of WHC. Many medias reported that KKFC will be on agenda of committee discussion again!

https://www.matichon.co.th/local/quality-life/news_1771526