We should by now be getting some leaked "news" about how evaluations for the 2019 WHC have gone!
I found this article
dated Feb 13 about JAIPUR
India had until Feb 28 to answer ICOMOS "concerns" about "illegal constructions
" within the proposed boundaries. Doesn't sound too hopeful for an immediate "Inscribe" recommendation by ICOMOS - of course that doesn't prevent India from getting it pushed through at the WHC!!!SILA
" have been withdrawn
following a negative review from IUCN - Dated 29 Jan.
2019. Auto translation of 1st para - "La Sila will not be a candidate to enter the UNESCO World Heritage Site . The Governing Council has decided to "postpone its presentation - reads the note from the dicastery - as the candidacy has received a negative assessment by the UICN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), evaluation body of the Heritage Committee World-wide competent for natural sites
But, if you read further, the whole subject seems mired in uncertainty, political intrigue and regional rivalry!!! Do we have an Italian Forum member who can shed more light on the matter??This update
(Turkey) doesn't indicate that IUCN have actually recommended it but doesn't say that it hasn't!!! Instead, as recently as Feb 2019 Turkey was still meeting with IUCN and providing informationKLADRUBY nad LABEM Stud Farm
(Czechia) seems quite bullish about its chances in this report
from Jan 2019 about a meeting with ICOMOS in Dec 2018 at which it presented further requested info