I would put it comfortably in my top 200 so would like to see it get on the ballot paper.
Well we haven't decided the "nature" of any voting yet but my "understanding" was that it would be a separate exercise albeit INFORMED by this first one which has, hopefully, extended the knowledge of all of us about the comparative value of WHS - many of which, I for one, was less well informed about when this exercise first started than I am now (even if my knowledge of some is still less than perhaps it should be)! The problem with just a straight vote would have been that people would inevitably vote for the sites they knew. But I would still hope that individuals could buck the trend if they wanted to!!
One possibility is that we would all be presented with the full list in 3 categories as determined in this "community exercise" from which to vote for the top 200 - Yes, Maybe and No. We could then record our individual views (if the previuos "Top 50 missing" is a basis we should get votes from many who didn't take part in this original exercise) - following the community conclusions or not. That way some "maybe" might get raised whilst some "Yes" might get downgraded! And possibly even some from "no" moved up to top??