I can see fr4nc1sc4 now added his/her vote and that for most categories some of his/her choices are sites that noone else voted for. The list is long:
Fertö, Mt. Carmel, Semmering, Modern Berlin, Baroque churches Philippines, Olomouc, Sacri Monti, Mt Etna, Sangiran, Bethany, Santiago de Compostela France, Daphni etc., Canterbury, Reichenau and Wörlitz.
I am by no way criticizing, in fact I am impressed by the originality. The question is how to proceed. So far I have tried to mostly include sites on the Out of the Race list noone supported. Only for the categories Els summarized I additionally took off sites with the support of a single member only. Otherwise, if there was support for any of the site, even by a single member, I took them off the list. Since fr4nc1sc4 has an extensive selection that does not match what other members voted for, I would be reluctant to do the same. I think it would be more rewarding for fr4nc1sc4 to explain his/her choices for those sites and see whether these explanations bring him/her support from other members. If any of these sites get supported by additional members I will take them out of the list. Does this seem ok to everyone?