don't think there was any decision on the Tsverkas or the Hill Forts as they were only discussing natural sites.
They brought these 2 cultural nominations forward on the agenda at the request of the states parties - both were inscribed.
The Hill Forts were "used" as an example of just how much "good" can be done to a nomination from an extra year's work. But ICOMOS had to give on their suggestion about an extension to a privately owned Fort -the (ex-)Maharajah doesn't want his site to be inscribed - Shock, horror!! How can anyone NOT want their site inscribed!!
No negative comment about all the Wooden churches and how many there are - just lots of back-slapping for all the international co-operation between Ukraine/Poland
Bijagos was the subject of an impassioned plea from Senegal not to leave it hanging -as the country needed help etc if all its people weren't to turn to the drugs trade. But then he rather weakly said that we just have to follow the AB recommendation. I wonder if all the delegates have had their cards marked on this subject -i.e don't keep on overturning the AB!